Rebuttal to former President Trump's demand for an increase in South Korea's defense spending

Since former President Trump demanded an increase in defense spending from South Korea, the issue has sparked debate about the nature of the South Korea-US alliance and South Korea’s contribution. This article examines the main counterarguments to the demand for an increase in defense spending and sheds light on South Korea’s position.

[Korea Today] Rebuttal to former President Trump’s demand for an increase in Korea’s defense spending © Reporter Kim Hyun-soo

1. Strategic importance of US forces in Korea

The USFK plays a vital role in maintaining stability in Northeast Asia beyond the defense of Korea. As a strategic asset to counter military threats from China and North Korea, the presence of the USFK contributes to the interests of not only Korea but also the United States. Therefore, the argument that Korea should bear a greater share of defense costs overlooks the role of the USFK.

2. Increase in Korea’s defense budget

South Korea has already been steadily increasing its defense budget. In 2020, the defense cost-sharing increased by more than 1 trillion won, which shows that South Korea is already contributing to the defense of the United States. In this situation, it can be argued that the demand for additional increases is excessive. South Korea is continuously investing to strengthen its own defense capabilities.

3. Interdependence of the alliance

The ROK-US alliance is based on the principle of mutual defense. The argument that Korea should bear a greater share of defense costs distorts the essence of the alliance. The defense cost sharing among allies should be done as part of mutual cooperation, and it is not desirable for one side to unilaterally bear a greater burden. The strength of the alliance comes from each other’s contributions and cooperation.

4. Economic imbalance

South Korea has a significant trade surplus with the United States. The demand for increased defense spending could further deepen the economic imbalance. It could be argued that it is unfair to demand additional burdens from South Korea, despite its contribution to the defense of the United States. This economic imbalance could have a negative impact on South Korea-U.S. relations.

5. International standards

In other international alliances, such as NATO, defense cost sharing is often determined in proportion to each country’s GDP. Korea’s demand for increased defense cost sharing may be unreasonable when compared to these international standards. Korea is already increasing its defense budget, and demanding additional increases does not meet international standards.

conclusion

It is clear that former President Trump’s demand for increased defense spending is excessive for several reasons. Considering the strategic importance of USFK, the increase in Korea’s defense spending, the interdependence of the alliance, economic imbalances, and international standards, this demand helps to reexamine the nature of the ROK-US alliance and Korea’s contribution. The ROK-US alliance should be further strengthened based on mutual cooperation and understanding.